For other studies focusing specifically on the connection between childhood sexual abuse and homosexuality, see here. The environment in which we are raised has a profound effect on our ongoing mental and emotional and social development. As for the notion that people are born gay, not only would that suggest that infants can relate to the concepts of sexual and romantic attraction which they obviously cannot , but it would also ignore the fact that our upbringing and environment have profound effects on us.
Why deny such an obvious reality? It is well-known that the children of alcoholics have a much higher chance of becoming alcoholics than the general population, and this cannot be blamed on genetics alone. How parents act and how they treat each other and their children has an influence on children growing up in the family.
These aspects of family life also affect the risk for alcoholism. In the same way, it is well-known that men who were abused as children are much more likely than the average population to abuse other children as adults. As summarized in a article in the British Journal of Psychology:. Having been a victim was a strong predictor of becoming a perpetrator, as was an index of parental loss in childhood.
But again, none of this should surprise us in the least, since the environment in which we are raised, especially if coupled with major, traumatic childhood experiences, has a profound effect on our ongoing mental and emotional and social development. In keeping with this, all the professional counselors I have spoken with including trained pastors and psychologists or psychiatrists have told me that the vast number of gays they have counseled were sexually abused as minors some told me this was the case in every instance they encountered.
What about the problem of heterosexual schoolteachers having sex with their students, especially female teachers with male students? More disturbingly, in gay circles, such relationships are often looked at as positive and nurturing, since, it is surmised, the boy was already aware of his same-sex attraction and the older man served as a mentor of sorts. In the words of Harry Hay, the gay icon and founder of the American gay movement:. If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.
In those cases where children do have sex with their homosexual elders … I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it, either because of a natural curiosity … or because he or she is homosexual and innately knows it. The reality is that children, especially pre-teens and young teens, are tremendously impressionable and malleable, as confirmed by this account shared by a Christian family activist reflecting on his pre-Christian youth :.
Ex-gay Robert Lopez, raised by his mother and her lesbian partner, had this to say:. We are talking about sexual acts. We can do this by: 1 being on the lookout for signs that our own children may have been abused; 2 refusing to allow our kids to be experimental pawns in the culture wars, because of which we strongly oppose sex-based LGBT curricula in the schools; and 3 no longer denying the common connection between childhood sexual abuse and adult homosexuality, thereby providing a path for healing and wholeness.
By doing these things, we will not only make this a teachable moment, we will make it a redemptive one. Brown, I kind of adore you but you may be missing something. Numbers may not lie, but people do and numbers rely on true reporting for accuracy. I doubt you have ever been sexually abused. I certainly hope you never have been. I did meet many most who would never tell those truths to anyone outside the community or any psychology or ministerial professionals. I would give anything to bring these confused people to the healing hands of Jesus and the pure love of The Father, but so far, that does not seem to be one of my gifts of communication.
God created men and women. God does not make mistakes. I was never abused, sexually or otherwise, as a child. Yet the attractions to other boys still happened. I grew up in a conservative church… I was told it was wrong. I never acted on my attractions. I was pretty lonely during my teen years as I would not, based on my churches teaching, act on my own natural attractions. I spent most nights crying out to God to change me… to make those attractions go away.
I attempted suicide twice because God was not answering my prayers in this matter. In my 20s I finally decided to do something about it, and went to a church based reparative therapy endorsed by Exodus. It nearly killed me. They finally reserviced about 6 years ago, and I found that I finally had to deal with the damage that therapy had actually done in my life. I am a gay man. God created me as a gay man. I am happier and healthier after turning to Jesus as a gay man than I ever was pretending to be straight.
God help Michael Brown and others like him see the damage they continue to do to people who truly need help. The name of Jesus is the name above all names, and you have the authority to use it Luke Oh you poor unfortunate soul. Apparently not. You can tell by the context of the passages in Genesis that the word is used. In each Genesis case the Hebrew word means something that is culturally unacceptable for a group of people, that is perfectly acceptable for another group.
I suggest you actually study your Bible before using words you do not understand. If there was nothing wrong with it, God would not have called for those people to be put to death Leviticus The gospel of Jesus Christ is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth Romans What is it you think Paul is talking about here? What is it believers are being saved from? The man you claim to worship evidently thought it was fine to toss out scripture that hurt people.
His teachings merely expanded on the law and explained it. The only thing Jesus defied was what the Pharisees added through their own customs. As far as hating Tim, I did no such thing. So why even focus on that aspect? Why not pursue what God has for you, if you truly believe? Nowhere in The New Testament does it say God has given believers a spirit of lust, but it does say that we have authority over every deceitful spirit Ephesians and Come to the light, so that your deeds may be manifest that they are wrought in God.
God has not turned his back on you. I AM pursuing what God has for me. YOU want to believe that homosexuality it all about lust. That tells me you do not know very many homosexuals… and I mean really know them on a personal level. Gary, Jesus told you this personally? Because I get an entirely different message when I pray. I found out by reading the Bible that God does not like queers. And the God of the Bible is not going to tell you something different. You must be getting messages from some other god.
John NIV : 16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. God Bless you, Gary. You have so much misinformation in your head, and it comes out through your heart. May God open your heart to love those who for you hold such disdain, and learn from them. Believing is not enough. One must obey. Be careful. New Testament clearly says queer behavior is sin. Romans 1 and 1Cor 6. What follows — the stuff people like you like to quote to gay people — is dependent on what happened before… so, what happens before verse 26??
You have worked very hard to justify your sin. I will pray for you to have the strength to resist and repent. There is no difference born in christian homes or out. Yes people are born gay. Many heterosexual people were abused as kids, but they have never become gays. No person in this world would desire to be in sexual minority, especially brought up in conservative churches, being involved in ministry … Romans one is not the ultimate source of truth about people being gays. There are Manny idol worshippers, ex Christians and atheists, who left bible, who changed living God to other gods, but they never became gays.
Even though I was never involved in any homosexual sex and I was never sexually abused as a child, I am still same sex attracted. No prayers and fast helps. And here I am telling you of my life of almost 4 decades. Nobody chooses to be gay, bisexual, or samesexattracted. Most of the population of the world would of been lgbt. Read it well and you will see it. The Greek words, malakoi s and arsenokoitay, are problematic for different reasons, however. That is the full extent of the appearance of the malakos adjective in the NT. Malakos appears in ancient Greek texts and is understood to mean, variously, freshly plowed when talking about land , luxurious when talking about clothing , and is also used to mean temple idol slaves or servants Homer and others.
It translated malakoi 1Cor into idolis servientes, which means idol slaves or servants. It seems to many scholars that the Latin translators were closer in time and culture than the English translators, so they would have a better idea of meaning. None-the-less, the KJV translation has, of course, stuck ever since. As far as arsenokoitay is concerned, it appears twice in Scripture and not at all in classic Greek literature. It is a compound word, not uncommon in Greek. Now, the first thing is that the Greek language is gender specific. These words have feminine endings which means they refer to something female.
The word parts are varied, however. What is being communicated here? Nobody is really sure. You could argue that this doubles up on the earlier use of adulterer appearing in the same verse, but that one is male tense. Romans and 1 Cor Let Jesus set you free. Face the truth. The Greek the words, malakoi s and arsenokoitay, are problematic for different reasons, however.
This is the full extent of the appearance of the malakos adjective in the New Testament. It appears in ancient Greek texts and is understood to mean, variously, freshly plowed when talking about land , luxurious when talking about clothing and is also used to mean temple idol slaves or servants Homer and others.
As far as arsenokoitay is concerned it appears twice in scripture and not at all in classic Greek literature. These words have feminine endings which means they refers to something female. What was being communicated here? No-one is really sure. So which meaning do you want to use? Run from these people!
Free Erotic Romance Books for Kindle - Freebooksy - Free Kindle Books
There is no use talking to them. None of these are Pharisee additions. These are laws that were always in the Torah…that Jesus rejected. I know it challenges your beliefs, I know it makes your views of gay people unjustified. But in the end, are religion and tradition really more important than compassion? If you say yes, you are a Pharisee. I think better to use new testament verses. Peace Brother. See the logical fallacy called Argument From Ignorance. Sounds about right. Genesis has a curious observation about the meal that Joseph ordered to be prepared for his brothers during their second visit.
I suspect this is your way of lying about the issue. Besides the Catholic Church found out the hard way what happens when they trust homosexual men to have unsupervised self control around children. Of course you were. I was never molested. But you have to believe I was to fit your agenda.
It happens in prison every day. You were too weak to over come trauma. The point you are making is exactly the one Dr, brown was raising in his article. In California the homosexual activists have managed to get a law banning therapy for kids that challenges their homosexual feelings. Also any speech negative to homosexuality is banned in schools. And yet the same folks celebrate homosexual child rape.
See a pattern here? The people who you condemn and slander are irrelevant so long as you push this narrative, right? Homosexuality is a natural variation with a genetic, and epigentic basis. Most people have brown eyes in some form dark brown, light brown, hazel, etc. Once this mutation for the blue variation entered the human genetic line it will never leave. It is simply a natural variation, which by the way only started about 10K years ago. In the Bronze Age, they could not understand the value or necessity or naturalness of these harmless variations, and they were frightened of what they could not understand.
Heck babies with birthmarks like a Portwine stain were considered to have the mark of the Devil and were often killed or villified and bullied for no reason. In other words, there is nothing to indicate the parenting or early childhood events, such as abuse, affect either gender or sexual orientation. Feeling like outsiders an sensing that they should not talk about the differences there are experiencing often makes this children more vulnerable to abusers. While there is a higher correlation between homosexual orientation and becoming a victim of sexual abuse, the abuse does not cause homosexual orientation; rather, there orientation makes a child more susceptible to the abuse.
The scenario is frequently twisted backwards to say that childhood abuse leads to homosexuality. This is patently false. The fact is that shamed children are easy and vulnerable targets for abusers. But heck, who wants research? YOU are part of the continuing problem of shaming in the church and therefore, part of the continuing cycle of abuse.
Name That Book
Most of it is generated in left-wing, progressive academic echo-chambers that reward conclusions that are perceived to be pro-LGBT and ruthlessly punish the opposite conclusions. Very few people would dare to reach the wrong conclusions lest their careers come to a screeching halt. Those who want to play that game know how. The lie is pretending two dudes having sex is normal. I have done the work and the research and it happens to be in my book.
We are not born sinners. Sin is an act of the will, not a genetic malady passed from parent to offspring. Your false doctrine of Original Sin only bolsters the claim of sodomites that they are born that way. Homosexuality is a sin. People are born sinners. Therefore, people can be born homosexual. Get your head out of Reformed books and see how vacuous their claims of this Augustinian doctrine really is. God makes each of us. We are His offspring. False, you put on a sinful nature when you start practicing it. You are not born with it. Sin is an action, not a physical constitution.
A significant percentage of gay men like man-boy sex; they would prefer a boy to another man. You should read the stuff the write, or listen to them tell their stories of fantasies about sex with teen or even pre-teen boys. The percentage of gay men who engage in or fantasize about this stuff is significantly higher than the percentage of straight men who want sex with underage girls. In fact, you straight out lie.
I truly, truly loathe people like you. Whatever cited research you may claim to have, there is too much knowledge outside your world that puts the lie to your claims. Why else would she put the works of men above the word of God? Kathy, actually Dr. Brown provided scientific documentation to back all his claims in the article linked in this sentence in his article: For other studies focusing specifically on the connection between childhood sexual abuse and homosexuality, see here.
It is not genetic, it is environmental. How can it be environmental if they are raised in the same environment? They have different finger prints, and foot prints… and most parents of identical twins will tell you that they have different personalities… right from birth.
Unless they were separated at birth, and adopted by different set of parents, most identical twins are raised not in similar environments, but the exact same environment at the exact same time. So much for your book.
Just another lie to perpetuate your Liberal agenda. Only they have sexual orientations. What a made-up buzz-term that they foist upon us…. So much for the God-hating, spiritually-dead, totally-depraved sons of disobedience and children of wrath. And I could really not care less about what a God-hating, spiritually-dead, totally-depraved, son of disobedience, and children of wrath has to think about what is a representation of the Christian religion.
Your faux-omniscience from your self-imposed god-complex has failed you again. You do that quite well all by yourself. And you have NO idea what I want. Your self-imposed narcissistic psychotic god-complex has you so deluded that you actually think you can read others minds! And you actually know very little about me but you have to believe otherwise so you can continue to antagonize me. Just like the typical little liberal snowflake. Has to blame them on someone else. Sorry bud, but everyone can see it is YOU who initiated this whole thing. Repeating yourself now and still talking outta your six about stuff you know nothing about.
Just keep talking. In fact, you shame yourself every single time you post with that avatar,. And, actually, I have EVERY right to talk about buzzwords that you and your agenda have foisted upon me and others like me. See, you labor under the delusion that your faith gives you some kind of power or superiority over the rights of others.
It does not. I know, I come from an area where people such as you are prevalent. It does. I am a Child of God. Adopted son of the Most High God. Co-heir with Jesus Christ. Poor fool. Has no life and has to go searching back 6mos just to find somebody to harass. By making such a statement you clearly demonstrate the depth of your intellectual dishonesty.
Really, you should be completely ashamed to call yourself an objective researcher. Truly pitiful! I am not a researcher or doctor. Just a common regular mom. The children in those homes are confused. The children left behind from homes that have broken off the marriage due to that lifestyle are so hurt and confused.
My sweet friend had a gay neighbor who was absolutely crazy and disrupted the entire neighborhood. He started things with every neighbor in that neighborhood. The Christians tried to reach out and love on him but he continued to always make threats. He was lonely, depressed and he knew he had a lot of problems and confusion. I wish so badly that other regular people that no one cares to hear from would share what they really see in that lifestyle.
When I worked in cosmetics I knew this young teen that was involved with an older young male. The older male would buy a ton of products for him. Anything the boy wanted. The young man could not even look me in the face. He was so sad and ashamed that for sex acts he lived to make his way and have nice things bought for him. Very sad and leads to slot of distruction. Thank you for the honesty. You seem very angry and bitter. We are 50 people who pray for each name on the list every day for 50 days. My, my. I think you for the prayer. You are wrong on your beliefs about the process in which homosexuality was taken out of the DSM.
Again, I did research with original sources, not rehashing of convenient narratives. If you go to my blog, I am EASY to find, and search the name Kenneth Lewes, you will have a recap of the longer version which I present in a full chapter of my book. Your information is severely flawed, but, since it likely works for you and your worldview, I would not expect you to challenge it.
Homosexuality was removed from the DSM due to political pressure… but not in the way that you believe. I have. It is on my bookshelf with other Satinover books. This is enemy territory, honey. First, not your honey. Secondly, unfortunately research is rarely welcome into Christian spaces where the topic is human sexuality. This is quite sad that people do not want to engage with their intellect and spirit. One can always hope people may choose to learn. Sadly, you are seemingly not amongst those who choose to engage with intellect and faith. We are not sinners because we sin; rather we sin because our very natures have been corrupted by the fall and we are sinners.
We love our darkness and do not come to the light on our own. We suppress the knowledge of God we do have and we have an aversion of loving and honoring God. This fundamental doctrine of radical depravity instructs us that sin permeates and infects every area of our being, including our sexuality. This in no way excuses us from the sinful activities we engage in because we know better. Yet, the banding together to celebrate that which God hates is common to sinful people and societies.
It is incontrovertible that a significant percentage of gay men like to have sex with underage boys. There is an entire language in the gay culture for this. The man-boy thing is a real thing among gays. Typically, they prey on boys who are gay and who are thrilled by the experience of affection from an older man who finds them attractive. Most boys who are not gay would naturally be revolted by it the advances of a man, and would resist. And God calls us all to repent of all of it and to return to Him with all our hearts.
Seems to me we should be able to agree that no one older should be pushing teens to have sex, no matter of what orientation. One difficulty, I think, is that the teenage years are generally when sexual desires are very strong. In other words, a time when teens can easily make bad decisions about sex, as well as allowing themselves to be manipulated or forced into having sex. Not good for anybody, I think, generally. How to stop it is another question. It was or when I saw it. That was a wakeup call to the dangers of male homosexual sex for me.
I always saw it as a strange thing up to that point, but this made the dangers of it apparent. Your story is merely anecdotal evidence. One kid you happen to know had the experience of being molested by a man before he had come to recognize his own sexuality. If that were true what explains all the molested boys who grow up to identify as heterosexual?
Or the millions of happily gay men who were never molested at all? No causation here, sorry. This was a long held belief until science arrived. Sorry, just not a fact based belief. Free Your Mind! My onetime best friend was probably never molested at all, for example, but I could see other factors leading to his homosexuality.
The rest of what you say is just appeal-to-authority fallacy. It may be because you want to go with the flow, or because it supports what you want to believe. Funny, decent people would look at it from the other direction: That homosexuality might be disagreeable to you, but that child abuse is inexcusable. Says a lot about your priorities. Why should homosexuality be illegal? Because it is a hazard to society. It spreads disease and costs citizens a lot of money with no benefit to anyone.
It also leads to the breakdown of morality in society which leads to many problems and expenses. I would have no problem banning all recreational drugs. Lots of people live to be old eating cheeseburgers and bacon in moderation. An immoral society is very hard to govern and cannot be trusted to behave themselves. They are prone to hurt themselves, and others and cause a lot of problems. Hiring police and keeping people in jail is very expensive and unproductive.
Those problems could be lessened if everyone would do what is right. We enforce some morals now. We have laws against murder, theft, and some other things that are immoral. But, if people would police themselves and not do those things, no one else would have to police them. Why is Islamic Law any worse than Christian law, if you want to enforce your own morality? Assuming you decide to enforce monogamy, heterosexuality, prohibitions on drugs, etc, how will you be any different from Saudi Arabia, considering that these are literally the same laws that are enforced there.
Saudi Arabia also bans homosexuality, recreational drugs, fornication, etc…. If you are really interested, you might do a study of the differences between Christianity and islam. But you need not worry that a Christian theocracy will be employed any time soon. Eventually, it will. But first, an anti-Christian dictatorship will come along. You might like it. Like I said, you want to ban the exact same thing that an Islamic theocracy is currently banning.
Are you sane? I doubt it. But I know you are wicked. Your support for homosexuals proves that. Islamic law puts homosexuals and those accused of homosexuality to death. Islamic law puts adulterers and those accused of adultery to death, and especially women who are the victims of rape. So how would you punish people, in your Christian theocracy, who broke prohibitions against homosexuality, fornication, and recreational drug use? Since you asked me what I would do, I would say that I would not recognize homosexual unions as being marriages, but I would not prohibit the union.
There is a very long waiting list in many places in America. As for fornication, I would do away with any governmental structures and programs that encourage fornication over marriage. The welfare system discourages marriage for fornication instead. I would eliminate anything from government that discourages marriage.
Marriage is what is best for children and women. Divorce and fornication are not. As for drugs, I would decriminalize end users in large part, but would heavily go after the traffickers to eliminate the flow of drugs into the country. I would seek to make it easier for people to get into successful rehabilitation programs so as not to be hooked on drugs for the rest of their lives. Everybody makes their own choices with how far they are willing for morality to impact their personal lives. Governments cannot make individuals embrace a certain form of morality, but they can stop doing things that promote people embracing harmful practices.
Yet heterosexual people also spread disease. And sadly, our society rejects the one thing that would protect it from sexually transmitted diseases: monogamous heterosexual marriage for life with lots of sex within it and no sex outside of it. When we live in a way that is against what we were made for, we should not expect that things would go well for us. I want to ask you to Google whale.
Prescott, and tell me your thoughts on that. It seems to be suggesting that the standard you are giving tends to lead to violence and abuse within a given society. Yes, heterosexuals spread disease. But not all churches are like that! Will pray for you, Mr. And if that freedom is abused it is no worse or no better than swearing to be utterly loyal to someone too. I recognize that most men are two faced assholes wanting one code of behaviour for themselves and one for partners.
I don't adhere to that personally. But I also see how that is driven by evolution as well - women ate better suited to monogamy than men are and it is this core issue difference that needs to be addressed by psychologists. You're missing my point a bit. I was not anti-porn before my relationship I was raised an atheist by a free-love hippie. So watching porn with my ex was a slowly traumatizing process where I gradually found out that: a.
The act of sex doesn't look anything like I imagined it to while participating in it and it makes me feel worse about the whole process to see it from an outsider's perspective; d. Porn as we know it today has nothing natural about it. It does not occur in nature that men can see those moments between two people without the two people reacting to being seen by him.
It doesn't occur in nature that a woman's body has fake breast and no pubic hair. There are more unnatural things about it but I don't even feel comfortable typing some of the woman-hating things I have seen in pornography, the obsession with not just having sex with a woman but seeing her overwhelmed physically to the point of what anybody can see would be incredibly painful. It is not just looking at naked women. Porn is about hurting women. We are talking about an industry that coined phrases like "barely legal" and "double penetration" and "ass gape".
Let's not be coy. It is a sickness, not a natural expression of sexuality. Regardless of your atheist upbringing I would argue it still occurred in a milieu of conservative attitudes inherent in a puritanical society. There a couple of times you use the term 'natural'. But your concept of what is 'natural' seems somewhat ill informed.
Let's take something like anal sex. Even in repressive cultures like Catholic dominated Europe this was practised by many as a way of avoiding pregnancy. But accepted. Take that one step further. Presumably you would call homosexuality unnatural too? In Spartan society it was a way of life - very natural for some 3 centuries!
Tiberius had specially trained anal sex experts even. Cave art and ancient art from early civilizations shows the erotic extremes to which human beings are drawn. I use porn a lot. I enjoy the powerful imagery of male dominance in some porn. Some men are the opposite and enjoy submissive male scenes. I know that the imagery satisfies something in my primitive dumb male brain. The point is that you have a somewhat idealized view of humanity.
If your boyfriend put you firmly last behind porn, then certainly find something new. But retain an open mind for heaven's sake. His porn indulgence is his problem - if that the way he wants to live then let him. That's his choice. Don't criticize porn itself, criticise him for his poor choices. I have a long term girlfriend. She isn't least interested in most of the porn I like. Yet she does not object nor criticize me. She understands men. I feel free and happy. That results in perpetual compliments from me to her, she's a beautiful woman, indeed a beautiful person, and my heart sings when I hear her voice or see her face.
The unnatural porn that you vilify can happily coexist within the context of a loving relationship, where one another's freedoms and desires are respected. PS: but yes, there are too many dumb men out there who have no balance in life, and thus treat women like shit. Avoid such individuals at all costs! Thanks Mansack! I am a woman who has been struggling with porn in relationships off and on for the past few years. While I don't think porn is necessarily a bad thing, I have definitely seen a lot of men use it in a way that stunts their own personal growth and damages their relationships and btw if your personal growth is being stunted, you're damaging your relationship.
But I agree that it totally depends on the person and their particular relationship to porn. I was in a relationship for many years with a man who watched porn compulsively every day, and it did not hurt the relationship. For one thing, he never tried to hide it. If I walked by while he was masturbating to porn, he would do everything he could to pull me in.
Sometimes I would laugh and continue to walk by, but other times I might be intrigued enough to join in. I think the hiding is what is so hurtful. Instinctively it feels very much like someone hiding an affair. I believe that in a great relationship great sexually at least , masturbating in front of each other should not be a big deal. That doesn't feel very good to me. I do often choose to masturbate in private, but only because it would be inconvenient at that time to have him involved he needs to be at work soon, he needs to get some sleep, or whatever.
That said, I live a couple miles from the porn center of the world, and if I can tell you one thing about that business it's that those people are gross and boring and cheesy. Not necessarily bad people. Just pathetic. I must admit that being around that industry has definitely given me a negative perspective on porn at times. Many men say that it's a simple fact that men desire other women, and women should just deal with it. I think it's simply that men have had much more social privilege than women, so they could have their cake and eat it too. Women are socialized to accept monogamy, because they've traditionally not had the privilege to have it any other way.
It is said that men are more visual.
Women are highly visual, but they are often not that conscious of it because we are taught to evaluate people primarily for their non-physical qualities. It took me years to realize that I had a very specific type physically. I would date men who were very far off from that type, and then I'd wonder why I couldn't feel excited by the relationship. I was actually happy to deal with a little extra weight or lack of height if their shoulders and brow bone turned me on. It's all highly personal. I do feel though, that a lot of men who watch commercially produced porn on a regular basis start fixating sexually on teenaged girls, and yeah that bothers me for so many reasons I don't know where to start.
And as a quick comment about the article: Bubble baths and shopping?!!! How do these writers get hired? Thank you for eloquently expressing that last paragraph - I am so tired of hearing the same broad statements about men and woman. Men have been taught their sexuality can be socially accepted, massive, not questioned and no need to think of the consequences; the deep seeded social norm that men have been handed in regards to their sexuality is far different then women's.
I have since a young age recognized that WOMEN are actually built to have many sexual partners they can if they wanted, have sex with one man and then move right onto the next, not even necessarily needing a brake, and have the ability to have multiple organism as long as they use protection of some sort, there does not need to be pregnancy involved AND are very visually arroused did you know women can become sexually aroused watching sexual intercourse of mammals?!
Not wanting to participate with animals, but just the mere act gets there juices flowing, men far less so Just by the way a man looks, dresses, and carries himself as well. Yet somehow society knows how to stifle, objectify, break, pressure, create shame and subdue this in us THEN have the audacity to wonder why we aren't just "totally ok" with how men want to be accepted in their lusts. Porn is absolutely not natural - it's comprised of shock value and there's rarely porn that shows an emotional connection between two people. IMO, porn is a tactless act that is very damaging psychologically and absolutely molds the male perception of what "love" should be.
Thanks for clearly expressing your opinion, Anon! Michael Castleman, M. He has written about sexuality for 36 years. Combining sex and alcohol produces some benefits—and many possible risks. Disabilities never preclude great sex. Back Psychology Today. Back Find a Therapist. Back Get Help. Back Magazine. Subscribe Issue Archive. Back Today. The Fallacy in "Evidence-Based" Treatment. Unintended Consequences and the Cerebral Cortex. Michael Castleman M.
Is He a Sex Addict? Chances are he's just self-soothing with one hand. The Audience: Men Solo Who views porn? Women's Fears Many women feel differently. References: Bergner, R. Submitted by Anonymous on December 22, - pm. I don't watch porn but I too Submitted by Anonymous on January 17, - pm.
Porn Submitted by walt on January 28, - am. Porn Submitted by Brad on June 4, - pm. I was a little shocked by Submitted by gg on February 29, - am. I was gonna say something else but can't remember. Oh well. Good article! We do Submitted by kim on March 16, - am. Women Against Porn Submitted by larry on March 26, - pm.
My husband masturbating while Submitted by SamD on March 26, - pm. Larry babe, by your logic, Submitted by SamD on March 26, - pm. I think you don't know what Submitted by James on June 12, - am. Porn Submitted by Lisa Reeves on May 29, - pm. This article is full of clueless nonsense Submitted by Lindsey on July 17, - pm. What do I think? Same opinion. Submitted by Kelly Cash on December 17, - pm. It becomes an addiction do to Submitted by Anonymous on October 9, - pm. Thank-You Submitted by Gigi on March 6, - pm. Husbands watching porn and Submitted by Anonymous on March 9, - am.
Really stupid people? Submitted by Mansack on March 10, - pm. Submitted by pat on November 20, - pm. Sigh Submitted by Jeff Gland on February 11, - am. Don't be absurd. Quit judging people. Porn actors are paid and accept the conditions. Find it disgusting? Don't do it, don't watch it. Porn not okay Submitted by Me on March 1, - am. Men Submitted by Sam on March 26, - pm. My experience Submitted by Anonymous on July 28, - am.
Submitted by Sara on January 31, - pm. Nothing against porn, but Submitted by Olive on December 18, - pm. Married men deal with their urge differently than single men. Submitted by Victor on December 3, - pm. Olive, sweetheart, I have no idea what you are talking about! I'm a woman Submitted by Anonymous on December 18, - pm.
Submitted by Anonymous on December 19, - am. Right on the Money Submitted by Anonymous on December 29, - am. I agree with you Submitted by Anonymous on September 4, - pm. I've been Submitted by Jayne Reynolds on November 27, - am. I concur! Submitted by Anonymous on January 13, - pm. I concur. To me it looks like a self esteem issue, specifically your self esteem. There is nothing your husband can do about anonymous, its not about him, its about you! Victor, You are an Submitted by Anonymous on September 26, - pm.
Victor, You are an idiot Uncomfortable truths Submitted by Mansack on March 2, - am. Your defense - anger - betrays you. Victor diagnoses your self esteem issues perfectly. By calling men sickos for watching porn is just the bigotry that defines modern feminism. Submitted by Anonymous on March 9, - am. Misery Submitted by Mansack on March 10, - pm. There will always be Victors in the world Submitted by Anonymous on September 6, - am. Yes indeed! Submitted by Mansack on September 8, - am.
Not quite Submitted by Anonymous on September 8, - pm. Preconceived notions Submitted by Mansack on September 10, - am. Great Comment Submitted by Rona on February 14, - pm. Frustrated Submitted by A woman on October 4, - pm. Submitted by Anon SC on October 10, - pm. Previous Page 1 current Next. Post Comment Your name. E-mail The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. Notify me when new comments are posted. All comments. Replies to my comment. Leave this field blank. About the Author. In Print:. View Author Profile.
More Posts. Continue Reading. Most Popular. More Like This. Porn Addict or Selfish Bastard? Get Listed Today. Our network. Popular Latest Longest. Swedish Big cock Amateur. Swedish Big tits Retro Vintage Redhead. Swedish Romantic. Anal Super Star. Swedish Vintage Retro Anal Amateur. John Holmes Cum Facial. Swedish Fetish Group sex. Deep Throat and Anal. Big Tits and Young Girls. Swedish Anal Vintage Romantic Orgy. Swedish Anal Vintage Orgy Romantic.
Swedish Lesbian Group sex Vintage Cunnilingus. Swedish Deepthroat Anal Erotic. Anal Erotic Swedish Deepthroat. Swedish Vintage. Celebrity Swedish. Vintage Cumshot Blowjob Retro Swedish. Masturbation Blonde Lesbian Swedish. Swedish Norwegian. Norwegian Swedish. Swedish Amateur Blonde Brunette Hardcore. Amateur Hardcore Blonde Brunette Swedish. Swedish Hardcore School girl. Hairy Swedish Vintage Group sex Hardcore. Swedish Amateur. Ginger Lynn.